Indicatori argomentativi

ANSCOMBRE, J. and DUCROT, O., 1997 [1989]. L'argumentation dans la langue. 3ème ed. edn. Liege: Pierre Mardaga.

BITZER, L., 1959. Aristotle's Enthymeme Revisited. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 45, pp. 409-414.

DUCROT, O., 1990. Poliphonia y argumentacion. Cali: Universidad del Valle.

DUCROT, O., 1984. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.

FREEMAN, J.B., 2005. Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

FREEMAN, J.B., 2000. What Types of Statements are There? Argumentation, 14(2), pp. 135-157.

GARSSEN, B., 2009. Comparing the incomparable: Figurative analogies in a dialectical testing procedure. In: F.H. VAN EEMEREN and B. GARSSEN, eds, Pondering on problems of argumentation. New York: Springer, pp. 133-140.

GARSSEN, B., 2001. Argument schemes . In: F.H. VAN EEMEREN, ed, Crucial concepts in argumentation theory. Amsterdam: Sic Sat, pp. 81-99.

GATTI, M., 2008. Negative Oppositions in Argumentation. L'analisi linguistica e letteraria, 16(2), pp. 929-942.

GAUTHIER, G., 2002. L’évaluation et l’attribution éditoriales : une analyse comparative du quotidien Le Devoir entre 1965 et 1995. Cahiers du journalisme, (10), pp. 60-73.

HASTINGS, A.C., 1963. A Reformulation of the Modes of Reasoning in Argumentation.  Ph.D. Dissertation. , Northwestern University. Evanston, Illinois.

HITCHCOCK, D. and WEGEMANS, J.2., 2008. The Pragma-dialectical account of argument schemes. In: E. FETERIS, B. GARSSEN AND F. SNOECK HENKEMANS, ed, Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, .

HITCHCOCK, D., 2002. The Practice of Argumentative Discussion. Argumentation, 16(3), pp. 287-298.

KRATSCHMER, A., 1998. Causalité et explication : vers une nouvelle approche. Revue Romane, 33(2), pp. 171-208.

LO CASCIO, V., 1991. Grammatica dell'Argomentare: strategie e strutture. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.

MIECZNIKOWSKI, J., 2011. Construction types and argumentative functions of possibility modals: evidence from Italian. Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1284-1297). Amsterdam, Rozenberg/SicSat. In: F.H. VAN EEMEREN, G. BART DAVID and G. MITCHELL, eds, Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Rozemberg/Sic Sat, pp. 1284-1297.

MIECZNIKOWSKI, J., ROCCI, A. and ZLATKOVA, G., 2013. Le funzioni inferenziali e polifoniche dell’avverbio epistemico italiano forse. In: D. PIRAZZINI and A. SCHIEMANN, eds, Dialogizität in der Argumentation. Eine multidisziplinäre Betrachtung. Frankfurt a. M: Peter Lang, pp. 201-230.

MOESCHLER, J., 1985. Argumentation et Conversation. Paris: Hatier.

MORASSO, S.G., 2012. Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: A case study in media argumentation. Discourse Studies, 14(2), pp. 197-216.

MORTARA GARAVELLI, B., 1997. Manuale di retorica. Milano: Bompiani.

MUSI, E., in corso di stampa. Argomentare parlando e parlare argomentando: la polisemia della parola argomento nella Divina Commedia. L'Aalisi linguistica e letteraria.

PINTO, R., 2001. Argument, Inference and Dialectic. Dordrecht: Springer.

PINTO, R., 1996. the relation of argument to inference. In: J. VAN BENTHEM and F.H. VAN EEMEREN, eds, Logic and Argumentation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences., pp. 163-178.

PLANTIN, C., 1996. L'argumentation. Paris: Seuil.

RESCHER, N., 2006. Presumption and the Practices of Tentative Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

RIGOTTI, E., 2014. The Nature and Functions of Loci in Agricola's De Inuentione Dialectica. Argumentation, 28(1), pp. 19-37.

RIGOTTI, E., 2009. Locus a causa finali. L'analisi linguistica e letteraria, (Special Issue "Word Meaning in Argumentative Dialogue"), pp. 559-576.

RIGOTTI, E., 2009. Whether and how Classical Topics can be Revived within Contemporary Argumentation Theory. In: F.H. VAN EEMEREN and B. GARSSEN, eds, Pondering on Problems of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 157-178.

RIGOTTI, E., 2006. Relevance of Context-bound loci to Topical Potential in the Argumentatation Stage. Argumentation, 20, pp. 519-540.

RIGOTTI, E., 2006. Relevance of Context-bound loci to Topical Potential in the Argumentation Stage. Argumentation, 20(4), pp. 519-540.

RIGOTTI, E., 2005. Congruity theory and argumentation. Studies in communication Sciences. Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction, , pp. 75-96.

RIGOTTI, E. and GRECO MORASSO, S., 2010. Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components. Argumentation, 24(4), pp. 489-512.

RIGOTTI, E. and GRECO MORASSO, S., 2010. Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components. Argumentation, 24(4), pp. 489-512.

RIGOTTI, E. and ROCCI, A., 2001. Sens - non-sens -contresens. Studies in Communication Sciences, 2, pp. 45-80.

ROCCI, A. 2017. Modality in Argumentation. A Semantic Investigation of the Role of Modalities in the Structure of Arguments with an Application to Italian Modal Expressions. Dordrecht: Springer.

ROCCI, A., 2013. Modal conversational backgrounds and evidential bases in predictions: the view from the Italian modals. In: L. DE SAUSSURE and K. JASZCOLT, eds, Time: Language, Cognition & Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 128-157.

ROCCI, A., 2012. Modality and argumentative discourse relations: A study of the Italian necessity modal dovere. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(15), pp. 2129-2149.

ROCCI, A., 2009. Modalities as Indicators in Argumentative Reconstruction. In: F.H. VAN EEMEREN and B. GARSSEN, eds, Modalities as indicators in Argumentative reconstruction. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 207-228.

ROCCI, A., 2008. Modals as lexical indicators of argumentation, A study of Italian economic-financial news. L'analisi linguistica e letteraria, XVI(Special Issue: Word meaning in argumentative dialogue), pp. 577-619.

ROCCI, A., 2008. Modality and its Conversational Backgrounds in the Reconstruction of Argumentation. Argumentation, 22(2), pp. 165-189.

ROCCI, A., 2006. Pragmatic Inference and Argumentation in Intercultural Communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3(4), pp. 409-442.

ROCCI, A., 2006. Le modal italien dovere au conditionnel: évidentialité et contraintes sur l’inférence des relations de discours argumentatives. Revue Tranel (Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique), 45, pp. 71-98.

ROCCI, A., 2005c. Connective predicates in monologic and dialogic argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences. Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction, , pp. 97-118.

ROCCI, A., 2005. On the Nature of the Epistemic Readings of the Italian Modal Verbs: The Relationship between Propositionality and Inferential Discourse Relations. In: B. HOLLEBRANDSE, A. VAN HOUT and C. VET, eds, Crosslinguistic Views on Tense, Aspect and Modality. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 229-246.

ROCCI, A., 2005. La modalità epistemica tra semantica e argomentazione. Milano: I.S.U. Università Cattolica.

ROCCI, A., 2005. Are Manipulative Texts Coherent? Manipulation, presuppositions, and (in-)congruity. In: L. DE SAUSSURE and P.J. SCHULZ, eds, Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twenthieth century: Discourse, Language, Mind. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 85-112.

STATI, S., 2002. Principi di analisi argomentativa retorica, logica, linguistica. Bologna: Pàtron ed.

TINDALE, C.W., 2004. Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

TIRKKONEN-CONDIT, S., 1996. Explicitness vs implicitness of argumentation: An

VAN EEMEREN, F.H. and GARSSEN, B., 2013. Argumentative patterns in discourse In: D. MOHAMMED and M. LEWIŃSKI, eds, Virtues of argumentation: proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA). Windsor, ON: pp. 1-15.

VAN EEMEREN, F.H. and HOUTLOSSER, P., 2002. Strategic maneuvering: maintaining a delicate balance. In: F.H. VAN EEMEREN and P. HOUTLOSSER, eds, Dialectic and Rhetoric: the Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 131-159.

VAN EEMEREN, F., HOUTLOSSER, P. and SNOECK HENKEMANS, F., 2007. Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. The Netherlands: Springer.

VAN EEMEREN, F.H. and GROOTENDORST, R., 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinions. Dordrecht/Cinnaminson: Foris Publications.

WALTON , D., REED, C. and MACAGNO, F., 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge, UK etc.: Cambridge University Press.

WALTON, D., 2006. Argument from appearance, A New Argumentation  Scheme.Logique et Analyse, 195, pp. 319-340.

WALTON, D., 2006. Argument from appearance: a new argumentation scheme. Logique et Analyse, (195), pp. 319-340.

WALTON, D., 1996. Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah N.J: Erlbaum.